Fullstack Development (TS)
One person who actually owns the whole thing
There's a reason "fullstack" became a buzzword. Real software needs the frontend, backend, infrastructure, and the connections between them to actually agree with each other. When those are split across three contractors who never talk, things drift.
I take ownership of the whole thing.
Sounds familiar?
- The frontend team blames the API team, the API team blames the database, nothing ships
- You need a small, focused product built end-to-end, not a six-person committee
- Your existing team is great but missing the "tie-it-all-together" person
What you get
- One person responsible for the whole stack — UI, API, database, deployment
- Shared types from frontend to backend, so refactors don't silently break things
- A product that ships and stays maintainable, not a clever architecture nobody else can touch
How I work
I scope tightly. Most "fullstack" projects fail because they tried to build everything before validating anything. We pick the riskiest piece, prove it, then fan out.
What matters more than the stack is choosing the right amount of stack. I'd rather ship a boring monolith that works than impress you with infrastructure you'll have to maintain.
Where I've done this: financial product platforms, vehicle configurators, fleet management interfaces, logistics planning apps. Comfortable across React/Vue, Node/NestJS, Postgres/Firebase, GCP/AWS/Azure, Pulumi/Terraform.